![]() But it is their differences that actually help developers to decide which one to choose. One similarity both platforms have is that they are free for individual users. Knowing each one of their differences allows you to make an informed decision about which platform is right for your goal and needs. ![]() Each one has specific features, benefits, drawbacks, and pricing. However, there are some differences between the two that should be taken into consideration when making your decision. ![]() As a result, it is not easy for users to decide between them. They offer fast, reliable performance and a range of features. Considering one can get a better virtual machine without licensing issues out of QEMU, or the best virtual machine with many of the same licensing issues out of VMware, there isn't much place for VirtualBox.Both VMware and VirtualBox platforms are widely used in the IT industry. And then there is VirtualBox, which lacks features like 64-bit or SMP guest operating systems, misses some hardware support entirely, and has no 3D acceleration support, yet also only provides a subset of functionality freely. A user who wants a free software solution can get the same from QEMU. A performance-conscious user can get many more features and optimal performance from VMware. VirtualBox simply has no reasonable niche. Just because it works well for limited purposes doesn't mean its the better for more intensive tasks, or even the best for its own task. It is much slower than QEMU, and a mile behind VMware. On the other hand, virtualization is very important to businesses (which are the primary target for virtual machine software) and VirtualBox is not nearly fast enough for a production environment. Home users don't need fast virtualization. See.we all have different needs here.Try using it in a production environment and see if it is still fast enough. Sounds like it includes everything I need. Does it run XP, and does it run it well? Yes. I am saying I notice no difference in speed.Īs far as features, VB has everything I need. It is so fast, I seriously can't tell the difference between running XP itself on its own hard drive, and running it under VB. I can't even tell of a speed difference between running Windows XP under VirtualBox, and running Ubuntu (of course having VirtualBox on top of Ubuntu). I am not sure where you're getting all this, but you should take into account how well VirtualBox has been working for many of us. Last edited by MRiGnS May 5th, 2007 at 04:35 AM. VirtualBox contains a builtin iSCSI initiator making it possible to use iSCSI targets as virtual disks without the guest requiring support for iSCSI. With the use of Shared Folders, users can share directories on their host system with guest systems. This is a combination of the RDP server and USB support allowing users to make USB devices available to virtual machines running remotely. VirtualBox implements a virtual USB controller and supports passing through USB 1.1 and USB 2.0 devices to virtual machines. This component implements a complete RDP server on top of the virtual hardware and allows users to connect to a virtual machine remotely using any RDP compatible client. Note that this list may change over time as some of these features will eventually be made available with the open-source version as well. The following list shows the enterprise features that are only present in the closed-source edition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |